Buy Low Price From Here Now
Readmore
Technical Details
- This adorable stacker is newborn appropriate- The rings are easier for baby to grasp and have rattle beads for added fun
- Flat bottom keeps the stacker within baby¿s reach
- Each ring has a different rattle sound, with a happy duck rounding out the top ring
- Five colorful rings are easy for little hands to grasp
See more technical details
By Jessica Jones (Ohio)
My son, now 7 months old, has enjoyed playing with this toy for a few months now. As someone else mentioned, it is smaller so it's a little easier for babies to grasp than the other one. My son likes playing with the duck, as well as shaking the rings, which all make a slightly different sound. Luckily he hasn't hit himself with one yet, because they are hard and it definitely wouldn't feel good. Overall I think it's a pretty good option in comparison to the traditional one, especially because the rattling rings can be entertaining long before an infant starts learning the stacking part.
By Teddy Bird (Deer Creek Mesa, CO)
I will admit that I was sorely tempted to buy the original Fisher Price stacker, the one we all had as kids. It's absolutely a classic and I may still obtain one of them.
But I was drawn to this one for my 5-month old because I remember reading somewhere that it is slightly smaller than the classic version with the large plastic hollow donuts. I thought smaller might work better for the little guy. Well. Since this toy has come into the house, not a day has gone by without at least one play session where he selects this toy to play with from among a lot of others.
Now 8 months old, he still loves this one. He tips over the base to let the rings fall free, takes one in each hand, and shakes them like tambourines. He smacks them together and has a grand old time. He is not at all interested in re-stacking them on the base, but that's fine with me because it just means the toy will last a while longer while he grows into that phase.
The topper on this stacker is the red ring with the little chick. This part does not rattle, which is a little bit of a shame. It also wedges kind of tightly onto the top of the base, so baby can't remove it himself, but that's OK.
I am very very pleased with this purchase. I have subsequently looked at some of the other stackers on the market and I am convinced this one is the cream of the crop.
By Kathleen R. Monroe (San Diego, CA)
I just wish that for a first stacker the material was a little softer. My babe is in the phase of banging everything, and she hits herself and me with the rings and it hurts us both. I just wish the plastic was a little softer. Otherwise it's cute, the rattles are nice.
By C.P. (USA)
Baby is 8 months old, and I didn't think she would really be that interested in this toy yet. I just wanted her to begin to grasp the "stacking" concept. But she loves to play with the round stackers. They rattle, and she likes to chew on them. It is one of her favorite toys. I put it in her crib in the morning, and it keeps her occupied so I can get an extra 10 to 20 minutes of sleep.
By Joni H.
My 12 month old grandson likes playing with this toy. He especially likes to shake the round discs. Each one has, what sounds like, little beads sealed inside that rattle when he shakes them. The only reason for giving it 4 stars is because the top red disc with the duck head on it doesn't make any noise, and I think it should since he doesn't play with that one when it's alone, but he does play with the other ones that rattle. He also has learned to put the discs on the stacker (not always in the right order), but that will come. It's nice he can play with a toy without dealing with the batteries wearing out.
Images Product
Buy Fisher-Price Friendly First's Ducky Rattle Stacker Now
